AES Encryption Explained: How It Works and Why It Matters
Jun 23, 2026
Generate the SHA-3 hash value of any string. SHA-3 provides multiple hash sizes (224, 256, 384, 512 bits) for different security requirements.
SHA-3 (Secure Hash Algorithm 3) is the latest member of the Secure Hash Algorithm family, standardized by NIST in FIPS 202 in August 2015. Unlike SHA-1 and SHA-2, which are all based on the Merkle–Damgård construction, SHA-3 is built on an entirely different paradigm called the sponge construction. This makes SHA-3 a true algorithmic alternative rather than just a longer version of its predecessors.
SHA-3 is based on the Keccak algorithm, designed by Guido Bertoni, Joan Daemen (a co-creator of AES), Michaël Peeters, and Gilles Van Assche. Keccak won NIST's open hash function competition in 2012 after SHA-1's collision resistance was broken in 2004. SHA-3 is not a response to specific attacks on SHA-2 (which is still considered secure) — it is a backup and a diversifier, designed so that the cryptographic ecosystem is not dependent on a single design family.
The SHA-3 family supports four output sizes: SHA3-224 (28 bytes / 56 hex), SHA3-256 (32 bytes / 64 hex), SHA3-384 (48 bytes / 96 hex), and SHA3-512 (64 bytes / 128 hex). Two extendable-output functions, SHAKE128 and SHAKE256, are also defined in FIPS 202 and produce variable-length output.
SHA-3 is built around a fixed-length permutation called Keccak-f applied to a state of 1600 bits. The sponge construction has two phases: absorbing and squeezing. During absorbing, the input message is XORed into the state in blocks (rate bits at a time) and the permutation is applied between blocks, padding the final block with the SHA-3 padding rule (10*1). During squeezing, output blocks are read from the state and permuted until enough bits have been produced. The split between "rate" and "capacity" bits determines the security level: a larger capacity gives stronger guarantees but slower throughput.
SHA-3 is recommended for any application that requires a modern, future-proof cryptographic hash. Practical use cases include:
hash('sha3-xxx', ...) family and redirects back to this page with the result.Note on Ethereum & Keccak: This tool uses the standardized SHA-3 (FIPS 202) which includes a domain-separation bit. Ethereum's Keccak-256 predates the final FIPS 202 padding and produces different digests than SHA3-256 for the same input. If you need Ethereum-compatible hashes, use a dedicated Keccak tool, not this one.
Here are some practical scenarios where this SHA-3 generator is useful:
Both are NIST-standardized cryptographic hash functions, but they are built on fundamentally different internal designs. SHA-2 (which includes SHA-256 and SHA-512) uses the Merkle–Damgård construction with Davies-Meyer-style compression functions. SHA-3 is based on the sponge construction over a Keccak permutation. Functionally both give you the same security properties — pre-image resistance, second pre-image resistance, collision resistance — and both are currently considered secure. SHA-3 exists primarily as an algorithmic diversifier: if a future cryptanalytic breakthrough breaks SHA-2, SHA-3 would still be safe because it does not share the same mathematical structure.
Not in the sense of "harder to attack today." Both SHA-2 and SHA-3 are considered fully secure against all known attacks as of 2026. SHA-3 is not "stronger" — it is a different design that provides insurance against the possibility of a future attack breaking SHA-2. If you are starting a new project, both SHA-256 and SHA3-256 are excellent choices. If you want to hedge against unknown unknowns, SHA-3 is the safer long-term bet.
In most cases, use SHA3-256 — it offers the same security level as SHA-256 and is the most widely supported in libraries. Use SHA3-512 for higher security margins (128 bits of pre-image resistance) or when you want a longer output for additional collision resistance. SHA3-224 and SHA3-384 exist mainly to match SHA-224/SHA-384 output sizes for compatibility and are rarely the best choice today.
No. Ethereum's Keccak-256 uses the original Keccak submission padding (0x01 followed by zeros), while standardized SHA3-256 uses the FIPS 202 padding (0x06). For the same input, the two digests will differ. If you need Ethereum-compatible hashes, use a dedicated Keccak-256 tool that explicitly uses the pre-FIPS padding.
No. The SHA-3 output is always exactly the same number of characters for a given variant: 56 hex chars (SHA3-224), 64 (SHA3-256), 96 (SHA3-384), or 128 (SHA3-512) — regardless of input size. An empty string still produces a valid SHA3-256 hash: a7ffc6f8bf1ed76651c14756a061d662f580ff4de43b49fa82d80a4b80f8434a.
Yes. This tool computes the SHA-3 hash on the server using PHP's hash('sha3-xxx', ...) family, so the input is transmitted via HTTPS in the form submission. If you prefer a fully client-side option, modern browsers support SHA-3 through the SubtleCrypto API (e.g., crypto.subtle.digest('SHA-256', data) works for all SHA-3 variants in recent browsers).
Blog
Jun 23, 2026
Jun 23, 2026
Jun 23, 2026
Jun 23, 2026
Jun 23, 2026
Jun 23, 2026